Connect with us


Thor: 5 Ways The Franchise Was Disappointing Before Ragnarok (& 5 Ways Ragnarok Improved It)

Fans felt the first two Thor movies were some of MCU’s weakest. But Taika Waititi’s Ragnarok gave some much-needed fun to the superhero franchise.

The opinion that Taika Waititi’s Thor: Ragnarok changed the MCU’s Thor solo franchise for the better isn’t entirely universal. But the Marvel fans who enjoyed the dreary, middle-of-the-road, quasi-Shakespearean first and second Thor movies and didn’t care for the colorful, hilarious, intergalactic antics of the third one are certainly in the minority.

RELATED: Thor's Solo Trilogy: 5 Things It Did Right (& 5 It Did Wrong)

Waititi’s film effectively gave the stagnant Thor franchise a much-needed makeover, turning one of the MCU’s least exciting franchises into one of its most profitable almost overnight. So, here are five ways that the Thor franchise was disappointing before Ragnarok came along, and five ways that Ragnarok improved it.

10 Disappointing Before Ragnarok: Took Itself Too Seriously

The first two Thor movies took themselves far too seriously. The God of Thunder was always prattling on about the dire consequences of disrupting the peace in the Nine Realms. He was as broody and mopey as Henry Cavill’s Superman. Space Vikings and magic hammers and Asgardian-set battle sequences should be fun.

2011’s Thor and its 2013 sequel, The Dark World, viewed everything through the lens of grave seriousness. Taika Waititi would drastically turn that around when he jumped in the director’s chair for Ragnarok.

9 Ragnarok Improved It: Added Some Much-Needed Comic Relief

Right off the bat, the biggest change that Ragnarok made to Thor’s solo franchise was adding some humor. The previous movies had comic relief, mostly resting on Kat Dennings’ shoulders, but Taika Waititi included as many jokes in Ragnarok as in any of his comedies.

And while the injection of humor was oddly controversial with some Marvel fans, it’s generally accepted that laughter is a good thing, and so the use of comedy put Ragnarok ahead of its predecessors.

8 Disappointing Before Ragnarok: Uninteresting Supporting Cast

Every MCU solo franchise has a cast of supporting characters to surround the hero. Iron Man has Pepper, Rhodey, and Happy; Captain America has Sam, Bucky, and Nat; and prior to Thor: Ragnarok, Thor had Jane, Darcy, and Dr. Selvig.

RELATED: Thor: Love And Thunder - 10 Ways Taika Waititi Can Fix Jane Foster

They weren’t a particularly interesting group. They had potential, but the movies never took advantage of it. Marvel fans were never thrilled when Thor’s supporting cast arrived in a scene and they weren’t at all sad to see them go when Ragnarok came along.

7 Ragnarok Improved It: Revamping The Supporting Cast

In Thor: Ragnarok, Taika Waititi cut the dead weight from Thor’s supporting cast (although he’s bringing back Jane Foster in Love and Thunder and giving her the powers of Thor, which should be interesting) and revamped them with some exciting new faces.

In particular, Waititi’s additions of Tessa Thompson as the hard-drinking, Pegasus-riding badass Valkyrie and himself as the mild-mannered rock monster Korg made Thor’s supporting cast immensely more engaging.

6 Disappointing Before Ragnarok: Generic Villains

The issue of generic villains is not confined to Thor: Ragnarok, as the MCU in general has been criticized for having a “villain problem.” But Thor and Thor: The Dark World did nothing to fix that problem.

In fact, with painfully one-note villains like Malekith, they actively created the problem. Loki is a clear exception to this, as he’s always been well-developed and interesting, but he was only really a villain in The Avengers.

5 Ragnarok Improved It: Unique Villains

Taika Waititi didn’t single-handedly fix the MCU’s villain problem with Thor: Ragnarok, but arguably, he did fix the Thor franchise’s villain problem ⁠— with a little help. Cate Blanchett relished the chance to play a flamboyant Disney-style villain in the role of Hela, bringing shades of Maleficent and Cruella de Vil to the character, while Jeff Goldblum was hilariously camp as the Grandmaster.

RELATED: Thor's 10 Best Scenes With Villains, Ranked

And instead of adapting a bland villain like the Destroyer to be the physical threat, Waititi gave Thor fans a villain they’d been waiting to see on the big screen for years, Surtur, and his apocalyptic presence didn’t disappoint.

4 Disappointing Before Ragnarok: Chris Hemsworth Wasn’t Having Any Fun

Chris Hemsworth has admitted that before Thor: Ragnarok reinvigorated the character, he was getting a little sick of playing the God of Thunder. And if the leading man isn’t having any fun playing a superhero, the audience isn’t going to have any fun watching their on-screen antics.

3 Ragnarok Improved It: Letting Hemsworth Run Wild

Just when Chris Hemsworth had lost all interest in playing Thor, Taika Waititi came along and let him run wild with the character. Playing to Hemsworth’s strengths as a comedic performer, Waititi made the role of Thor fun for the actor ⁠— and, as a result, fun for the audience.

2 Disappointing Before Ragnarok: Deifying Thor

The changes in Thor’s characterization in Ragnarok were not entirely comedic. Before Ragnarok, the God of Thunder was depicted as just that: a god.

RELATED: Guardians Of The Galaxy Vol. 3: 5 Ways Thor Could Make It Better (& 5 Ways He Could Hold It Back)

Whether Dr. Selvig was studying his face like an old coin or Darcy was swooning over his superhuman physique, the previous Thor movies strangely went to great lengths to emotionally distance the titular hero from the audience.

1 Ragnarok Improved It: Humanizing Thor

In Thor: Ragnarok, Waititi doesn’t frame the titular Norse god as an idealized, all-powerful deity. Within the first act, Thor’s dad dies, his hammer is destroyed, his kingdom is invaded, and he’s stripped of his powers.

In doing so, the movie humanized a character who had been overtly portrayed in previous movies as a counterpoint to humanity.

NEXT: MCU: 5 Ways Taika Waititi Improved Thor (And 5 Ways The Russos Did)

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Movies4 weeks ago

The Little Mermaid is the Absolute Worst

In the wake of Frozen 2’s $1 billion haul, the debate rages on about who is the best Disney princess...

Movies2 months ago

The 30 Best Movie Trilogies of All Time

What makes a good trilogy? Well, for starters, you have to follow the same theme throughout the entire series —...

Pop Culture2 months ago

18 celebs that were on TV before becoming Movie Stars

Everyone knows that movie stars get more love than the actors on tv. Why is that? Perhaps there is truly...

Movies3 months ago

Best Female Leads in Horror Film History

From “Scream Queens” to “Final Girls” the female role has continued to evolve in the horror genre, no longer are...

Movies3 months ago

10 Overlooked Movies of the 2010s

The 2010s was a solid decade for cinema. Even with a rise of remakes, creators didn’t shy away from innovation....

TV3 months ago

10 Times Someone From Jackass Should’ve Died

As America entered the 21st Century, man reached an evolutionary peak once thought unattainable. With the invention of personal internet...

Movies3 months ago

Slow to Fast: All 9 Fast & Furious movies ranked from worst to best

Fast and furious. There are no two words that have meant so much in cinematic history. Love it, or hate...

Pop Culture3 months ago

10 Most Underrated Shows of the 2000’s

It’s a new decade in this 2020, which means we’ve said goodbye to so many shows, and we’re saying hello...

Movies3 months ago

20 Films That Will Have You Reaching For Tissues

Sincerely, how good does it feel after you weep uncontrollably? Is it wrong to find pleasure in undergoing melancholy from...

Movies3 months ago

10 worst movies with a Star-studded cast

Even the brightest stars cannot hope to lighten up the darkest nights. That goes to say that even if a...